From: Raymond E. Feist
Date: 24 February 1998
Kesh is more Egyptian-Parthian (with maybe a little Babylonian tossed in), but certainly not Roman or South African (either Zulu or Afrikans).
FAQ answers attributed to Raymond E. Feist are copyright by Raymond E. Feist.
It should also be born in mind that the answer given was only applicable on the date written, and to a specific question. You may find further, similar questions, in the FAQ.
